پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 44 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,877 |
| تعداد مقالات | 15,278 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,731,595 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,563,832 |
Restrained roman domination in graphs | ||
| Transactions on Combinatorics | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 4، شماره 1، خرداد 2015، صفحه 1-17 اصل مقاله (273.85 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: National Conference on Labelings and Decompositions of Graphs | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22108/toc.2015.4395 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Roushini Leely Pushpam* 1؛ Sampath Padmapriea2 | ||
| 1Department of Mathematics D.B.Jain College, Chennai 97 India | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics Sri Sairam Engineering College Chennai 44 India | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A \textit{Roman dominating function} (RDF) on a graph $G = (V,E)$ is defined to be a function $ f:V \rightarrow \lbrace 0,1,2\rbrace$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v)=2$. A set $S \subseteq V$ is a \textit{Restrained dominating set} if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to a vertex in $S$ and to a vertex in $V - S$. We define a \textit{Restrained Roman dominating function} on a graph $G = (V,E)$ to be a function $f : V \rightarrow \lbrace 0,1,2 \rbrace$ satisfying the condition that every vertex $u$ for which $f(u) = 0 $ is adjacent to at least one vertex $v$ for which $f(v)=2$ and at least one vertex $w$ for which $f(w) = 0$. The \textit{weight} of a Restrained Roman dominating function is the value $f(V)= \sum _{u \in V} f(u)$. The minimum weight of a Restrained Roman dominating function on a graph $G$ is called the Restrained Roman domination number of $G$ and denoted by $\gamma_{rR}(G)$. In this paper, we initiate a study of this parameter. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| domination؛ Roman domination؛ Restrained domination | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
G. Chartand and L. Lesniak (2005) Graphs and Digraphs Fourth edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
P. Dankelmann, J. H. Hattingh, M. A. Henning and
H. C. Swart (2006) Trees with equal domination and Restrained Domination numbers J. Global Optim. 34, 597-607
G. S. Domke, J. H. Hattingh, S. T. Hedetniemi, R. C. Laskar and L. R. Markus (1999) Restrained domination in graphs Discrete Math. 203, 61-69
G. S. Domke, J. H. Hattingh, S. T. Hedetniemi and L. R. Markus (2009) Restrained domination in trees Discrete Math. 211, 1-9
G. S. Domke, J. H. Hattingh, M. A. Henning and L. R. Markus (2000) Restrained domination in graphs with minimum degree two J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 35, 239-254
E. Ebrahimi Targhi, N. Jafari Rad and L. Volkmann (2011) Unique response roman domination in graphs Discrete Appl. Math. 159, 1110-1117
E. J. Cockayne, P. A. Dreyer Jr., Sandra M. Hedetniemi and S. Hedetniemi (2004) Roman domination in graphs Discrete Math. 278, 11-22
O. Favaron, H. Karami, R. Khoeilar and S. M. Sheikholeslami (2009) Note on the roman domination number of a graph Discrete Math. 309, 3447-3451
X. Fu, Y. Yang and B. Jiang (2009) Roman domination in regular graphs Discrete Math. 309, 1528-1537
A. Hansberg and L. Volkmann (2009) Upper bounds on the $k$-domination number and the $k$-roman domination number Discrete Appl. Math. 157, 1634-1639
T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi and P. J. Slater and eds. (1998) Fundamentals of domination in graphs Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 208
T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi and P. J. Slater and eds. (1998) Domination in graphs; Advanced Topics Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York
M. A. Henning and S. T. Hedetniemi (2003) Defending the roman empire-A new strategy Discrete Math. 266, 239-251
M. A. Henning (1999) Graphs with large restrained domination number Discrete Math. 197/198, 415-429
M. A. Henning (2002) A characterization of Roman trees Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 22 (2), 325-334
M. A. Henning (2003) Defending the roman empire from multiple attacks Discrete Math. 271, 101-115
H.-M. Xing, Xin Chen and X.-G. Chen (2006) A note on roman domination in graphs Discrete Math. 306, 3338-3340
N. Jafari Rad and L. Volkmann (2011) On the roman bondage number of planar graphs Graphs Combin. 27, 531-538
N. Jafari Rad and L. Volkmann (2011) Roman domination perfect graph An. Stiint. Univ. ``Ovidius'' Constanta Ser. Mat. 19 (3), 167-174
T. Kraner Sumenjak, P. Pavlic and A. Tepeh (2012) On the roman domination in the lexicographic products of graphs Discrete Appl. Math. 160 (13-14), 2030-2036
C. S. ReVelle (1997) Test your solution to ``Can you protect the Roman Empire? John Hopkins Magazine 49 (3), 70
C. S. ReVelle and K. E. Rosing (2000) Defendens Romanum: Imperium problem in military strategy American Mathematical Monthly 107 (7), 585-594
R. R. Rubalcaba and P. J. Slater (2007) Roman domination influence parameters Discrete Math. 307, 3194-3200
P. Roushini Leely Pushpam and T. N. M. Malini Mai (2008) On efficiently roman dominatable graphs J. Combin Math. Combin. Comput. 67, 49-58
P. Roushini Leely Pushpam and T. N. M. Malini Mai (2009) Edge roman domination in graphs J. Combin Math. Combin. Comput. 69, 175-182
P. Roushini Leely Pushpam and T. N. M. Malini Mai (2011) Weak roman domination in graphs Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 31, 115-128
P. Roushini Leely Pushpam and T. N. M. Malini Mai (2011) Weak edge roman domination in graphs Australas. J. Comb. 51, 125-138
P. Roushini Pushpam and T. N. M. Malini Mai (2012) Roman domination in unicyclic graphs Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography 15, 237-257
I. Stewart (1999) Defend the Roman Empire! Scientific American 281 (6), 136-138
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6,024 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,462 |
||