
تعداد نشریات | 43 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,737 |
تعداد مقالات | 14,198 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 34,892,896 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,924,283 |
کنترل پروژه مبتنی بر احجام مصرفی کسب شده | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
پژوهش در مدیریت تولید و عملیات | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 04 خرداد 1404 اصل مقاله (1.16 M) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی- انگلیسی | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22108/pom.2025.142101.1572 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کریم آتشگر* 1؛ بهاره امانی2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1گروه مهندسی صنایع، مجتمع مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2گروه مهندسی صنایع، مجتمع مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران ، ایران | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
هدف: یک پروژه را میتوان با سه رویکرد کنترل کرد: 1) رویکرد مبتنی بر هزینه، 2) رویکرد مبتنی بر مدت زمان انجام فعالیتها، 3) رویکرد مبتنی بر احجام مواد و مصالح مصرفی در پروژه. روشهای متعددی مانند روش ارزش کسب شده(EVM) ، برنامهزمانبندی کسب شده (ES)، و زمان کسب شده (ED) از سوی محققین برای کنترل پروژهها معرفی شده است. روشهای معرفی شده، قادر هستند که پروژهها را مبتنی بر هزینه و زمان کنترل نمایند، حال آنکه در پروژههای واقعی ، مدیران و کارشناسان پروژه نیاز دارند که پروژههای خود را حتما مبتنی بر احجام و میزان مواد مصرفی که برای فعالیتهای پروژه استفاده شده است، تجزیه و تحلیل نمایند، و پیشرفت واقعی پروژه را مبتنی بر احجام کاری انجام شده، بررسی نمایند. این مقاله درصدد است که یک روش جدید و نوآورانهای را معرفی نماید که بوسیله آن بتوان پروژها را مبتنی بر احجام مواد و مصالح مصرفی بخوبی کنترل و تجزیه و تحلیل کرد. طرح / روش / رویکرد: عرصه واقعی پروژهها نشان میدهد که، تجزیه و تحلیل هزینههای یک پروژه، بیشتر مستقیما از میزان مواد و مصالح مصرفی در پروژه، متاثر میگردد. بعبارت دیگر، پیشرفت واقعی یک پروژه، بیشتر از میزان مواد و مصالح مصرفی در پروژه متاثر میشود تا از پول هزینه شده و یا از زمان مصرف شده برای انجام فعالیتها. رویکردی که در روش پیشنهادی این مقاله وجود دارد به مدیران پروژه این امکان را میدهد که بتوانند مواد و مصالح مصرفی در یک پروژه را که دارای واحدهای اندازهگیری متفاوت هستند را با هم ترکیب نماید، و سپس احجام فیزیکی مصالح مصرفی در پروژه را بصورت جداگانه و یا بصورت توام و یکجا (تحت یک عنوان) برای کل پروژه کنترل نماید. یافتهها: پایش و کنترل احجام کسب شده مواد و مصالح مصرفی یک پروژه، به مدیران و کارشناسان پروژه کمک میکند که بتوانند بصورت اثربخش، پیشرفت واقعی پروژه را تجزیه و نحلیل و تفسیر نمایند.کنترل مواد و مصالح مورد نیاز یک پروژه این شرایط را برای مهندسین فراهم میآورد که بتوانند بصورت اثربخش: 1) وضعیت پیشرفت واقعی پروژه ، 2) میزان مواد و مصالح ضایع شده، 3) دوباره کاریهای انجام شده در پروژه را تجزیه و تحلیل نمایند. این رویکرد مهم، شرایطی را فراهم میآورد که مدیران پروژه (با روش پیشنهادی این مقاله) بتوانند مدت زمان و هزینههای پروژه را بصورت واقعیتری نسبت به روشهای موجود، پیشبینی نمایند. مفاهیم عملی: در این تحقیق، چندین اصطلاح برای استفاده در کنترل پروژه پیشنهاد میشود که بوسیله آنها میتوان پیشرفت واقعی را بصورت اثربخش در شرایط کاری واقعی بدست آورد. در این مقاله برای نشان دادن قابلیتهای روش پیشنهادی، پیشرفت فیزیکی یک پروژه واقعی با استفاده از روش پیشنهادی، بررسی و تجزیه و تحلیل میشود. اصالت / ارزش: روشهای موجود برای کنترل پروژهها، قادر نیستند که پیشرفت پروژهها را بر اساس مواد و مصالح واقعی که عملا در پروژه مصرف شده، تحزیه و تحلیل نمایند. در روش پیشنهادی این مقاله، برای تجزیه و تحلیل پیشرفت پروژه، این امکان فراهم شده است که احجام مواد و مصالح مختلف، با واحدهای اندازهگیری متفاوت، با هم ترکیب شوند، و سپس میزان پیشرفت فیزیکی پروژه تجزیه و تحلیل واندازهگیری شود. مزیت فوق، این امکان را فراهم میآورد که روش پیشنهادی این مقاله بتواند برای پروژههای مختلف، قابل استفاده باشد. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مدیریت حجم کسب شده؛ مدیریت ارزش کسب شده؛ مدیریت زمان کسب شده؛ مدیریت برنامهزمانبندی کسب شده؛ کنترل پروژه | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earned value management (EVM) as an efficient method has played an important role in new approaches to integrated project control. In the last two decades, different indicators have been proposed based on EVM, to evaluate the performance of a project. Most of these indicators are based on cost and time dimensions. This approach attempts to perform the progress analysis by comparing the planned data and actual implementation records leading to keeping the project on track. EVM focuses on analyzing the performance of the project management based on cost and financial terms (Kim et al., 2003), (Liu et al., 2022), and (Aramali et al., 2023). Lipke (2003) showed that there is an important problem when one uses the EVM method. The EVM uses two important terms to analyze the progress of a project:
Where EV and PV denote the cumulative earned and planned values at a determined time, respectively. The SPI index is calculated based on equation 2.
The SPI indicator is a measure of how close the project is to being completed compared to the schedule. If this index addresses a value higher than 1, it indicates that the project is progressing well against the schedule at a specified time. In the case that the SPI is equal to 1, then one concludes that the project is progressing exactly as planned. In the condition that the project is running behind schedule, the SPI is less than 1 value. Consider a project which is behind its schedule, in this case, one expects that the indicators show the falling behind the project schedule over the time of the project. Lipke (2003) described that when a project manager uses EVM, at the completion of the case that a project has been running behind schedule, SV and SPI equal zero and 1 values, respectively. It means that the project has progressed exactly as scheduled, however the project manager knows that the project has been completed late. The analysis showed that SPI and SV are not two accurate and reliable measures for analyzing a project's performance. Lipke (2003) also described that the EVM approach measures the performance of a project in cost units, not units of time and then proposed a new method based on the concept of earned schedule named (ES) method. Later Khamooshi and Golafshani (2014) proposed an earned duration management (EDM) method to control the progress of a project compared to its schedule. Khamooshi and Golafshani (2014) decoupled schedule and cost performance measures and proposed indexes leading to analyze the progress of a project. Literature review indicates that EVM, ES, and EDM are the three main methods approached in the last decade in the literature. Based on the three approaches, several different authors have contributed to developing different methods to analyze and control the progress of a project. Noori et al. (2008) used a fuzzy control chart for earned value analysis. Pajares et al. (2011) proposed two metrics that combine EVM and Project risk management for project controlling and monitoring. Colin & Vanhoucke (2014) based on the EVM method proposed a new statistical project control to provide setting tolerance limits leading to improving the discriminative power between progress situations. The method proposed by Colin & Vanhoucke (2014) used the statistical method to analyze situations compared with the project baseline schedule. Yousefi & Currie (2016) and Yousefi et al (2019) applied statistical control charts on EDM indices. They claimed that the statistical method is capable of analyzing the variations in project schedule performance. Sackey et al. (2020) developed a model to improve the estimate at completion (EAC) term in the EVM method. They claimed that the proposed forecasting helps project management to schedule metrics accurately. Andrade & Vahoucke (2017) proposed a method based on combining EDM and EVM methods. The proposed method follows a simplification approach for project time and cost management. Leu et al. (2006) attempted to improve the performance of traditional EVM using statistical control chart methods. They claimed that the proposed method allows analysis of in-progress project cost and schedule trends. They discussed that the proposed approach is capable of highlighting possible needs for corrective action. Leu et al. (2006) explained that their proposed statistical control technique can assist practitioners in managing project performance effectively. Sogandi et al. (2015) also approached the statistical process control to monitor the indexes of the EVM method for analyzing the performance of a project. Batselir & Vanhoucke (2016) focused on improving project forecast accuracy using the integration of earned value management (EVM) with exponential smoothing and reference class forecasting. Ballesterose et al. (2019) proposed two new EVM metrics for monitoring and controlling projects. In this paper, they proposed Earned Schedule min (ESmin) and Earned Schedule max (ESmax) terms. Bagherpour et al. (2020) to enhance the performance of conventional EVM, categorized the factors on EVM into four main clusters and then the most effective ones are separated from the clusters. Priyo (2021) analyzed four units of building construction projects using the EVM method consisting of 1) a project performance analysis, 2) cost estimation, and 3) time for project completion, along with a planning estimation analysis against project completion. Almeida et al. (2021) analyzed the impact of uncertainty in the progress measurement in earned value analysis. Mahmoudi et al. (2021) approached earned duration management under uncertain conditions. Sheikhalishahi et al. (2022) attempted to improve earned value management (EVM) and earned schedule (ES) using statistical quality control charts considering the existence of dependence between cost and schedule. Liu et al. (2022) used earned value management for greenhouse gas emissions management in prefabrication and modular. Acebes et al (2022) approached stochastic methods to analyze earned duration for project schedule management. Bakhshandeh & Zare Mehrjerd (2022) estimated project efficiency based on a dynamic simulation model of earned value management. They claimed that the proposed approach can be used to determine the impact of various project management functions on improving project efficiency. Aramali et al. (2023) introduced a framework to measure EVMS maturity, including 56 attributes arrayed across ten subprocesses. These attributes together make up an integrated project/program management system. They examined the relationship between the proposed maturity model and ten project performance metrics through statistical analyses. Table 1 addresses the reference approaches controlling a project based on the earned concept. As described above, the literature indicates that consumable volumes of activities of a project have not been contributed by the proposed methods of the literature approached earned concept. The proposed methods of the literature used the earned concept for the duration of time and cost, while the consumable volume plays the most important role in the project scheduling and its real progress report. Table 1. References of the literature approached EVM, ES, and EDM
Really the progress of a project occurs when consumable volumes corresponding to the project improve. The consumable volume term has wide application in project management and is usually used by contractors, clients and project offices to analyze the real progress of a project. How to progress the consumable volume of activities is one of the most important concerns of contractors and employer project managers. This paper proposes a new method to analyze the performance of a project based on consumables corresponding to the deliverable activities of a project. The novel proposed method of this paper provides a good understanding of the real progress of a project for all levels of project managers. Furthermore, the analysis of the real progress trend of a project based on consumable units (especially when a project is terminated) provides invaluable information for project managers and engineers. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: The next section is allocated to describe the opportunity provided by the proposed method of this paper. The third section introduces completely the proposed method for controlling a project. The fourth section considers the use of the proposed method in a real project case. Finally, concluding remarks are provided in Section 5.
The project cost estimate is directly related to the consumables corresponding to products or work packages. Materials which are consumed in a project can be categorized into two groups: 1) Renewable materials (such as human and machine resources), and 2) Non-renewable materials (such as construction materials, concrete and rebar). Methods which are used to construct a project affect the type of materials and consequently their volumes. Furthermore, tender documents of a project are prepared based on the methods and volume of consumables designed for the project. Assume a contractor wants to participate in a tender. After the contractor receives the tender documentation, an engineering team starts to analyze the methods and volume of material designed for the project. This analysis leads the team to estimate the cost of constructing the project leading to a bid price. If the volumes and methods change during the construction process of the project, its cost will be affected and changed. In some cases, the project design is revised and naturally, the volume sizes will be changed. However, in very real cases, without revising the design, the volume of consumables increases due to reworks, material waste, variation of technical specification of materials, and inefficient planning. In a project, controlling the volume of consumables plays an important role in the success of project management. Now assume that the project is controlled using EVM or EDM by the contractor. In this case, all the related terms of EVM or EDM are monitored. In these methods, although the management is led to analyze the cost or schedule time of the project, it is not possible to conclude: 1) How much has the project progressed based on the volume of consumables?, 2) How much of the time delays are related to changes in volume of consumables?, 3) How much of the increased cost is related to changing of the volume size consumables?, and 4) Does the increased cost affect provisional statement or the final statement (the statement should be completed based on the volumes recorded in the contract and tender documentations)? When a project is monitored based on the volume of consumables of products and work packages, it is possible to control and analyze reworks and resource wastes of the project. Once a project is controlled based on the cost, and the actual cost overruns are compared to planned costs, EVM is unable to identify the cause(s) of reworks or wastes or both of them. Project managers are interested usually in knowing the progress of the project based on the volume size of consumables over time of the implementation of the project. Controlling a project focusing on volumes of products not only helps engineers to control the schedule time and cost simultaneously but also provides the condition of analyzing methods, machines, men, and materials as well as the environment of constructing work packages or products. Controlling a project based on the volume of consumables leads to improving the contractor's know-how during the implementation of the project.
Project controlling is the process of observing the project plan implementation, collecting data on implementation, performing analysis by comparing the planned data with the actual implementation data, and finally keeping the project on track using data analysis. As discussed in the introduction, the earned approach is one of the most widely accepted approaches by practitioners in the project management field. In this research, we use the data collected in the process of monitoring and controlling project management to develop controlling measures. The necessary data is obtained based on the quantity surveying and contractor statement. As this required data is used by project management teams, there will be no additional costs for data collection to produce reports for the proposed method of this paper. As described in the previous section, the existence of project control methods leads practitioners to analyze the performance of a project based on cost or schedule duration measures. However, the volume of consumables of activities and work packages is capable of addressing the more realistic condition of the project performance. Really, in practice, the actual progress of a project can be well addressed by volume units. In this paper, we present a critical evaluation of earned bulk assessing schedule performance. Then a comprehensive set of new indices is introduced which are easy to measure and status understanding in real managing projects. These indices can be used to measure the real bulk progress and performance of the project in application. As an example, the bulk performance index (BPI) measures the bulk-based progress of the project compared to the used actual bulk. We also discuss the potential advantages of these measures. Additionally, we develop estimation performance measures which can be used effectively by contractors, clients, and the scheduling offices to assess the estimated and planned progress of a project. Though BPI(t) is argued to be a preferred option to measure performance compared to SPI. SPI has some conceptual shortcomings and could not be validated as a general method which is applicable to all scenarios. Consequently, EVM, ES, and EDM inherently are deficient in dealing with the measurement of consumed volume (i.e., real progress). The aim of the proposed earned bulk of this paper is to provide a new method to monitor and analyze the performance of a project effectively based on the volume of consumables. Since in practice, the volume measurement units are different, the most important problem in analyzing the progress of a project in volume dimension is how to pool different volume units. In this research to pool different volume units corresponding to different activities, it is provided that the volumes without units are included in the calculation of the progress value. The following steps should be provided by engineers before using EBM proposed in this paper:
In this proposed method, at any point in time to analyze the progress of a project, it is allowed to pool the different units of volumes without a unit of measure. For this aim, we propose focusing on the percentage of progress instead of the unit of any type of volume. For example, consider three different measures for three different deliverable product types, say a ton, cubic meter, and square meter for a project. Obviously, it is not possible to sum the volume values of these materials leading to a report on the progress percentage of the project. To overcome the problem, it is proposed that firstly one calculates the progress percentage of each material. In this way, the calculated percentages do not have a measurement unit and then different volumes of materials can be pooled. In this case, the following calculation is performed:
The result of equation 3 indicates that no unit of measurement governs it. Hence in this proposed approach, it is possible to pool different bulks with different units in percent term. Monitoring the progress of a project based on cost and time cannot address a clear and realistic picture of the actual status of the progress of the project in volume terms. The method approached in this paper leads practitioners to control and monitor a project effectively based on the quantity surveying and contractor statement. For the proposed EBM three terms are defined: 1) planned bulk (PB), 2) earned bulk (EB), and 3) actual bulk (AB). These three terms lead practitioners to conclude the status of the existing progress of a project and predict the future volumes of the project. The following equation (4) leads to the calculation of PB for time t of the project progress analysis. In this equation, denotes the cumulative sum of planned bulks at time t of the project.
Where is the non-cumulative planned bulk of activity i in time period j. The summation on i is used for activities with the same unit of measurement. In this equation n denotes the number of activities since the start of the project up to and including time period t which are measured by the same unit. The count k indicates the measurement unit of bulk types used in the project, such as meter, cube meter, ton etc. In other words, since the bulk of each deliverable product is measured by a unique unit, the progress percentage of each product/activity should be separately calculated. Equation 4 indicates that there are v measurement unit types in a project. The abbreviation of indicates the bulk at completion (BAC) for the bulk type k of the project. The description leads one to conclude that is the average planned progress at time t of v various volume types related to the project deliverable products. The earned bulk and the actual bulk of a project at time t are calculated using Equations 5, and 6, respectively.
Figure 1 shows the concept of EB, PB, and AB during the time graphically. As shown in Figure 1, if one draws a line at a specified point in time parallel the horizontal axis from the EB curve until it intersects the PB curve, and then the intersection point is moved down, the obtained point indicates the time when the earned volume should have been obtained. The following equation 7 indicates this concept:
where AT addresses the time of the above description. Figure 1 shows two possible cases in a project. Case 1 indicates the PB curve is below the AB curve and case 2 shows the PB curve is above the AB curve. In Figure 1, EAC indicates the estimate of competition of the project in bulk terms. Equation 8 indicates the bulk variance (BV) at time t.
where is the bulk variance of the project at time t and addresses the difference amount of the actual and the earned in volume term at time t. Table 2 shows different cases for the BV term and the corresponding interpretation of the project performance. The bulk performance index at time t ( ) is also calculated by the following equation 9.
Fig. 1. Concept of Earned bulk indexes graphically Table 2. BV cases may be provided in a project
In this section to demonstrate the performance of the proposed volume-based project control method, real project case data is investigated. The real case data correspond to a residential commercial building project in Tehran, Iran. The first level of the work breakdown structure (WBS) of the project is shown in Figure 2.
Fig. 2. The first level of WBS of the case study The project was scheduled considering more than 2290 activities based on WBS. The schedule of the project predicts that the project will be terminated 593 days after the project is started. Table 3 indicates the progress reports of the project for 20 months using the EVM method. As shown in the CV and SV columns, all the values corresponding to the two indicators are negative. These mean that the project is behind schedule throughout its execution. As shown in the last record of Table 3, at the completion of the project SPI and SV are equal unity and zero, respectively. It means that the project progressed exactly as scheduled, however, we know that the project has been completed late. Since reporting the measurement units of all activities of the project is not possible in this paper, as a part of the project activities, some activities (defined in the 3rd level of WBS of the third floor of the west building project) are shown in Table 4. In Table 4 all 16 general activities do not follow the same measurement unit. Table 4 intends to address that there are different measurement units for analyzing the project progress based on volume values in this project. Table 5 indicates the results corresponding to EBM indexes for each period considering the measurement unit of each activity. Table 3. EVM report of the residential commercial building project
Table 4. Measurement units of some activities for the case study
Table 5. EBM report of the residential commercial building project
Table 4 provides information to analyze the performance of the residential commercial building project based on volume size. Two EB and AB indexes help directly an engineer to analyze the progress and consumption of materials in this project.
As mentioned above, for the novel proposed EBM method three terms: 1) planned bulk (PB), 2) earned bulk (EB), and 3) actual bulk (AB) were defined. These terms lead engineers to conclude the real status of the current progress of a project and predict the future volumes that will be consumed. However, the existing models in the literature are not capable of analyzing the status of the real material volumes consumed in practice. In this proposed method, to analyze the progress of a project, it is allowed to pool the different units of volumes without a unit of measure. This feature of the proposed method allows engineers to use the proposed method for all project types. In the previous section, to demonstrate the performance of the proposed volume-based project control method, real project case data was investigated. The real case data correspond to a residential commercial building project in Tehran, Iran. Table 3 intends to address that there are different measurement units for analyzing the project progress based on volume values in this project. Table 4 indicates the results corresponding to EBM indexes for each period considering the measurement unit of each activity. As shown in the EB and AB columns, all the calculated values in these columns follow the unequal EB < AB. It means that during the implementation of the project, the materials have been consumed more than the volumes calculated by the designer of the building. Since during the implementation of the project the quantity survey and estimation of material volumes have not been changed, the extra consumed material is related to reworks and waste materials. The analysis of the EBM method is capable of addressing the material consumed in excess of the project design amount, accurately. The column of BPI also addresses the ratio of the earned volume to the actual consumed volume. The values of this term indicate that the volumes consumed in this project are not the same amount calculated by the designer. Table 4 indicates that from 21-10-2020 date onwards the value of EB is less than PB. It means that the project from this date onwards is behind the base schedule. Table 4 also indicates that on the 03/12/2020 date based on PB value, at the end of the 593th day after the starting, the project should be terminated, however, EB value addresses that the earned volume of the project is 97.390 %. Figure 3 shows the S-curves of EB, PB, and AB of the studied project. This figure also shows the latest EAC and the bulk at completion (BAC) comparatively.
Fig, 3. PB, EB, and AB curves of the case study EAC is calculated using the following equation 10 and BAC is calculated by the design engineer.
The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) method forms the basis for expressing the real forecasting accuracy of a certain forecasting technique. The MAPE used by Vandevoorde and Vanhoucke (2007), Rujirayanyong (2009), and Vanhoucke (2010). The lower the MAPE for a particular forecasting method, the higher the accuracy of that method. MAPE is calculated as Equation 11:
Where A is the actual final value and denotes the forecasted value at time t. MAPE method for evaluating the proposed method is used in this research based on the following equation (12).
The calculation indicates that MAPE is 0.71 for the proposed EBM however this index is obtained at 10.09 for the EVM method. The MAPE term addresses the high accuracy of the proposed model for monitoring a project based on analyzing material volume values for the project.
Literature addresses different methods based on cost and time terms that have been proposed by researchers for controlling the progress of a project. However, the methods introduced in the literature are not capable of providing a report considering the volumes of consumables for the project. The analysis of the progress of a project considering the volume of materials consumed for activities, is an essential report for project management. This paper proposed a method to monitor the progress of a project based on the volume of materials of activities with different measurement units. In this proposed method, data is obtained from quantity surveying and contractor statements as two important and reliable documents of the project. This research revealed that monitoring earned volumes helps practitioners effectively access the real progress of a project. This paper showed that controlling the material of a project leads effectively project engineers to the real status of the project progress, waste material, and reworks. This approach also leads project managers to predict the duration and cost of a project more realistically. The analysis of a real project case in this paper based on the EBM indexes found that the proposed approach of this paper provides a clear and real progress report for the project based on the volume of consumables. The analysis of MAPE addressed the high accuracy of the proposed EBM method. This research indicated that the EBM method is capable of providing an accurate picture of project progress in each time period during the construction of the project. Combined approaches including statistical methods are proposed for future research. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acebes, F., Poza, D., González-Varona, J.M., & López-Paredes, A. (2022). Stochastic Earned Duration Analysis for Project Schedule Management. Engineering, 9, 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.07.019 Almeida, R., Abrantes, R., Romão, M,& Proença, I. (2021). The Impact of Uncertainty in the Measurement of Progress in Earned Value Analysis, Procedia Computer Science, 181, 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.191 Andrede, P., & Vahoucke, M. (2017). Combining EDM and EVM: a proposed simplification for project time and cost management. Journal of Modern Project Management, 5 (2), 94-107. DOI:10.19255/JMPM01410 Aramali, V., Gibson Jr, E., Asmar, M., & Sanboskani, H. (2023). Novel Earned Value Management System Maturity Framework and Its Relation to Project Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12985 Bakhshandeh, M., & Zare Mehrjerd, Y. (2022). Project Efficiency Estimation Based on Dynamic Simulation Model of Earned Value Management. The Journal of Productivity Management, 17(64), 49-69. DOI: 10.30495/qjopm.2022.1937137.3200 Bagherpour, M., Khaje Zade, M., & Mahmoudi, A. (2020). Interpretive structural modelling in earned value management. Journal of Civil Engineering Management 26(6), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12182 Ballesterose-Pérez, P., Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Mora-Melià, D., González-Cruz, M.C., Fuentes-Bargues, J.L. & Pellicer, E. (2019). Earned Schedule min-max: Two new EVM metrics for monitoring and controlling projects. Automation in Construction, 103, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.016 Batselir, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2016). Improving project forecast accuracy by integrating earned value management with exponential smoothing and reference class forecasting. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.003 Colin, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2014). Setting tolerance limits for statistical project control using earned value management. Omega, 49, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.06.001 Khamooshi, H., & Abdi, A. (2017). Project Duration Forecasting Using Earned Duration Management with Exponential Smoothing Techniques. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(1),04016032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000475 Khamooshi, H., & Golafshani, H. (2014). EDM: earned duration management, a new approach to schedule performance management and measurement. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6),1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.11.002 Kim. E., Wells, W.G., & Duffey, M.R. (2003). A model for effective implementation of Earned Value Management methodology. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00049-2 Leu, S.S., Lin, Y.C., Chen, T.A., & Ho, Y.Y. (2006). Improving traditional earned value management by incorporating statistical process charts. 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Tokyo- Japan. 275-280. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2006/0053 Lipke, W. (1999). Applying management reserve to software project management. Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 12(3), 17-21 Lipke, W. (2003). The schedule is different from The Measurable News, College of Performance Management of the Project Management Institute. Meas News, 31, 31–34. Liu, G., Huang , R., Li, K., Shrestha, A., & Fu, X. (2022). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Management in Prefabrication and Modular Construction Based on Earned Value Management, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002268 Mahmoudi, A., Javed, S.-A., & Deng, X. (2021). Earned duration management under uncertainty. Soft Computing, 25(14), 8921–8940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05782-6 Noori, S., Bagherpour, M., & Zareei, A. (2008). Applying Fuzzy Control Chart in Earned Value Analysis: A New Application. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(4), 684-690. Pajares, J., & Lopez-Paredes, A. (2011). An extension of the EVM analysis for project monitoring: the cost control index and the schedule control index, International Journal of Project Management. 29 (5), 615-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.005 Priyo, M. (2021). Earned value management system in Indonesian construction projects. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 13(3), 37-45.DOI: 10.30880/ijie.2021.13.03.005 Rujirayanyong, T. (2009). A comparison of three completion date predicting methods for construction projects. Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 6(4), 305-318. Sackey, S., Lee, DE. & Kim, BS. (2020). Duration Estimate at Completion: Improving earned value management forecasting accuracy. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(3), 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0407-5 Sheikhalishahi, M., Abdolhossein Zadeh, S., Naeimi, S., & Sardardabadi, A. (2022). Improving Earned Value Management and Earned Schedule by Statistical Quality Control Charts Considering the Dependence between Cost and Schedule. Journal of Qua; its Engineering and Production Optimization, 7(1), 177-198. DOI: 10.22070/jqepo.2022.15415.1215 Sogandi, F., Mousavi, S.-M & Amiri, A. (2015). Controlling EVM indices in construction projects by a statistical technique, The 10th International Project Management Conference, Tehran, Iran. Vandevoord, S., & Vanhoucke, M. (2007). A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics. International Journal of Project Management 24(4), 289-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.004 Vanhoucke, M. (2010). Measuring time: improving project performance using earned value management. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science vol, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1014-1 Yousefi, N., & Currie, K. (2016). Statistical control charts usage for Project Schedule index in EDM, IIE conference. Yousefi, N. Sobhani, A., Moslemi Naeni, L., & Currie, K.R. (2019). Using statistical control charts to monitor the duration-based performance of the project. Journal of Modern Project Management, 6(3), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.02270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 34 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 9 |